Home Page of the DPNA Website Learn about the Drug Prevention Network of the Americas, its history, principles, members, supporters, and board Looking for information about drug prevention?  Check out our web page links, books, presentations, position papers, and brochures Want to connect with national, regional or international drug prevention sites?  Visit our extensive Links section. Keep up with the latest drug prevention news and events. Ready to become a part of the Drug Prevention Network of the Americas?  Sign up on line.



WWW DPNA News and Updates
Drug Research
Opinions
Drug Effects
Drug Information
Drug Trends
Best Practices
Drug Legalization
Drug Policy
Books and Guides
Brochures
Courses
Presentations
Funding Sources

 


Feds, States Diverge on Medical Marijuana


JoinTogether.com April 24, 2006


News Summary

State officials say a new statement from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) denying that marijuana has medical uses won't affect state laws legalizing medical-marijuana use, the New York Times reported April 22.

Nathan Barankin, a spokesman for California attorney general Bill Lockyer, said the FDA statement is "consistent with the long-held federal view on this medicine, and that is that marijuana is the equivalent of heroin and cocaine. California voters disagree."

He added: "There's sort of a détente. Both sides respect that we have laws that differ. Federal law-enforcement agencies for the most part have shown some respect for California law by only going after those individuals who seem to be clearly not in the medical-marijuana business for the medical part of it -- which are the same people the state law is going after."

"Really, there's nothing that's going to happen -- any third parties judging whether these substances are effective -- that is going to change Maine law," added Maine assistant attorney general James M. Cameron; Maine passed a medical-marijuana law in 1999.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) said the statement helped clarify the position of the federal government and its intention to enforcement the laws against marijuana use.

Medical-marijuana advocates said the FDA statement could make it harder to pass medical-use laws in states like Connecticut, New Jersey, and New Mexico, which are currently considering such legislation. A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that federal marijuana laws could be enforced even in states with medical-marijuana laws had a similar chilling effect.

"We're going to have members of state legislatures say, 'But even the FDA has said there's no medical value,' " said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. "That's where it's going to hurt."